• 1 Votes
    4 Posts
    172 Views

    I never wanted to be a Computer Scientist. I wanted to be an astronomer. I thought physics could take me anywhere. Between subatomic particles and beyond galaxies. Through a series of events partially out of my control, I ended up at FAST, instead of UET (the only name I had heard of right up until the point of my application to FAST). I hated everything they were teaching in a CS degree. It took me to get through 3 semesters of torturous courses to finally find a course I liked. Assembly language particularly appealed to me because I absolutely loved the way my instructor engaged with me. I found myself so deeply involved that I gave up my gaming nights just to design microprocessors. I quite literally quit my first passion for that. Later on in my undergraduate, I was discouraged from taking the Phonetic course(for the simple reason that the course was useless). Today, I hold a PhD specializing in the same subject. My primary purpose for sharing these details is that life will eventually give you an opportunity to pursue something that brings you sheer joy. Be fearless in your pursuit whenever that time comes. Please forget about your GPA, it legitimately will not matter. Go for amazing teachers even if they are bad graders. If you have the passion you will find your way into your dream job or dream program.

  • 4 Votes
    1 Posts
    148 Views
    No one has replied
  • 2 Votes
    2 Posts
    90 Views

    In US, most universities start sending out offers around early January. These offers are sent out on a rolling basis. Recipients of these offers are generally expected to inform the universities of their acceptance or rejection by the 15th of April. As many students receive multiple offers, it is common for them to send their decisions well before April 15th. This, in turn, enables universities to extend offers to individuals on the waiting list, should previously extended offers be declined.

  • 2 Votes
    1 Posts
    132 Views
    No one has replied
  • Grad Interview prep

    Moved Interviews
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    159 Views

    In my experience with Ph.D. interviews, it is primarily to get a sense of how you interact with the PIs, the level of maturity in your responses, and clarity in your future goals and ambitions is essential. Other than that, as others mentioned, you need to demonstrate a strong link between your interests and what the program/professor has to offer. Ph.D. is a very serious commitment, and you need to demonstrate you are taking this decision after due consideration. I would recommend having good questions prepared to ask before the interview as well as some follow-ups to showcase you know the program well and have specific and thoughtful questions.

  • 2 Votes
    6 Posts
    147 Views

    I think rankings should not be considered in isolation and scrutinized too much. Many programs consistently remain in the top 10 or top 20 for example, but vary a lot along that list. This does not mean they actually get better or worse. Some ranking criteria are very volatile and tied to factors that may not be of interest to you for example openness to veterans or amount of publications in an area that is not of interest to you. So perhaps evaluate programs based on the tier in which they fall (top 10, top 20, top 30) rather than the exact number. If you then have to account for rankings look at subcriteria provided by rankings, like QS for instance has diversity and employment outcomes sub criteria for ranking as well, which may be more important for international students.

  • 3 Votes
    6 Posts
    174 Views

    I recommend thoroughly searching through the Financial Aid and Assistance options subsection of program websites. Usually, there is some general statement about university/program policy regarding this. For Ph.D. programs, you can also check professor/PI websites which often mention whether they are looking to hire in a certain season. Other than that I think the resources others mentioned should help you find some answers.

  • GRE Prep Plan

    Moved Standardized Tests
    6
    2 Votes
    6 Posts
    184 Views

    I would recommend staying away from the Princeton Review and Kaplan series as I have come across several reviews claiming they do not mimic the actual GRE difficulty or question style even closely. The preparation for verbal and Quant is a bit too extensive to cover in 1 month and you might feel like you don't have enough time. I have heard good reviews about Magoosh and Gregmat to develop strategies but in terms of GRE Question difficulty, sticking to official guides is your best bet. These are made by ETS and are actual questions that appeared in recent tests. Studying the reasoning given for each answer will help you understand the type of thinking the exam expects from you. Furthermore, the hard questions there and the free Power Prep 1 and Power Prep 3 are your best resources for the closest approximation of exam difficulty and setting. Make sure to give them after you think you are ready. Remember to write the essays as well and giving 2 full timed tests will help you realize the pressure and conditions of the actual exam. Study your mistakes thoroughly and make sure to identify weak areas and strengths so you can adjust your prep accordingly. Best of luck with everything!

  • 2 Votes
    6 Posts
    198 Views

    A format I followed was to link an element/feature of the program the SOP was for with each of my project/research interests, mentioning it immediately after I explained my interest. For example, when I wrote about building a tool which I eventually want to launch as a startup in the near future, I followed it up by mentioning the entrepreneurial classes and venture lab in that university to show that I have a charted trajectory for this program and that I can build on my specific goals and aims using program facilities.

  • 2 Votes
    1 Posts
    94 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    122 Views

    @Mukhtiar-Ahmad The availability and types of financial aid for graduate students can vary significantly by university and program. In my experience, PhD applicants often receive full funding through scholarships, assistantships, and fellowships, though the mix may change annually. Assistantships come in two types: Graduate Research Assistantships (GRAs), which involve research often related to the student's dissertation, and Graduate Teaching Assistantships (GTAs), which involve teaching duties.

    Master's students typically do not receive funding upon admission but may secure scholarships or assistantships later by reaching out to their department or faculty members.

    Again, these opportunities depend greatly on the specific university, program, and departmental resources. More detailed advice requires information on the targeted university, program, or field of study.

  • 2 Votes
    2 Posts
    140 Views

    @Mukhtiar-Ahmad In general, most Master's programs are not funded. However, there are exceptions, such as Masters by Research programs. In addition, you can also fund your Master's via research assistantships or teaching assistantships but they come with their caveats. For example, for the former, you need some research experience. There are also various scholarships you can apply for that are typically geared towards specific regions or countries (e.g., Fulbright Scholarship, Commonwealth Scholarship). I hope this helps.

  • 1 Votes
    2 Posts
    169 Views

    @Mukhtiar-Ahmad It is challenging to assess one's chances of admission solely based on the GPA. GPA is one important factor but your recommendation letters, experiences with independent projects, SOP, and test scores play an important role too. I've had students with less than 3.0 GPA who have been admitted to good universities in the US so there is certainly hope 🙂

  • 2 Votes
    1 Posts
    98 Views
    No one has replied